The First Amendment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The prototypical Amendment - Essay ExampleThe First Amendment speaks to the very heart of what it mean to be an American.In guaranteeing the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition, it ensures that each and every individual in the United States is offered some rudimentary inalienable rights With these rights comes the inescapable task of responsibility.These responsibilities were not intelligibly delineated in the constitution.In fact, the notion of free speech has been challenged to a great degree in that it is very esoteric in nature and when exercised to the full extent, it holds the electromotive force of endangering lives.This paper will present an in-depth examination of the right to free speech and the notion that there should be a limit placed on such(prenominal) a right.First and foremost, the First Amendment refers to the rudimentary freedom of expression.At the forefront of the freedom of expression is the notion of freedom of speech.This freedom faci litates the expression of individuals without the interference or constraint of the governing bodyfederal or state. It, however, operates under the assumption that this freedom may be limited if it proves to be detrimental to others or infringes upon the rights of others. One such case is virtuoso in which a persons freedom to speak serves to effectively and efficiently facilitate a breach of peace or cause violence. In those cases the Supreme Court places a stringent requirement on the government wherein there must be a justification for the actions of the government to interfere or otherwise regulate those rights. sparedom of speech is not limited to verbal expression. It extends to other mediums which facilitate communication (Cornell School of Law-First Amendment, http//www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/First_amendment).Substantive treatments of freedom of speech in the United States tend to be Court-based, meaning they focus primarily or entirely on Supreme Court decisions. S tudies such as James E. Leahys The First Amendment. 1791-1991 Two Hundred Years of Freedom (1991), Rodney A. Smollas Free speech communication in an Open Society (1992), James Brewer Stewarts The Constitution, the Law, and Freedom of Expression, 1787-1987 (1987) and Cass R. Sunsteins Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech (1993) all exhibit a similar tendency-the tendency to frame or categorize Free Speech in terms of mingled issues. and so to clarify each of those issues by relying on specific, landmark decisions, or a chronology of decisions, by the Supreme Court. In A Worthy Tradition Freedom of Speech in America, for example. Harry Kalven, Jr. begins by exploring the concept of Content-in terms of Heresy and Blasphemy (Cantwell v. Connecticut, 1940 Burstyn v. Wilson, 1952 Epperson v. Arkansas, 1968 Torcaso v. Watkins, 1961) then False Doctrine (Kingsley Pictures v. Regents. 1959 Street v. New York. 1969) and admiration (Hannegan v. Esquire. 1946 Winters v. New York. 1948 C ohen v. California. 1971 Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire. 1942).While limited in ways, these approaches do reveal one important thing-the inadequacy of these definitions of Free Speech. At the very least, they show that the various Courts have always been in the business of weighing Freedom of Speech against other interests and values- which is to say that the Courts have never construed Freedom of Speech as hitherto remotely absolute. Contingencies such as location (public/private, for example), situation